Northlaw
I take issue with your statement that Halal forbids Muslims from eating meat from animals that have been strangled beaten to death killed by fall gored to death………………, an for a simple reason. Camels are one of the strongest animals on earth and they were created in that manner to be able to handle the very hard life in Middle East. But they are eaten too, so the fact that they are very strong, you cannot tie a Camel and drop him down as we do to a cow or a goat to slaughter him/her . He/she will simply not go down. Camels are killed by beating the crap out of them and breaking their structure.
Why do Moslems eat them?
EM Toronto
Thé Mulindwas Communication Group “With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy” Groupe de communication Mulindwas “avec Yoweri Museveni, l’Ouganda est dans l’anarchie”
[mailto:panafricanistforum@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of northllaw Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 11:59 AM for the public?
Why slaughter according to the Muslim method ?
This will help understand…
It [Halal] also forbid Muslims from eating meat from animals that have been strangled, beaten to death, killed by a fall, gored to death and those that have been savaged by a beast of prey.
The pagans, including the revisionist Christians, think its to do with ‘blood’ as they are to some extent obsessed with blood themselves. Their prayer houses still have ‘altars’ which were originally used for killing, sacrifice to their god, which meant their altars were covered in blood. The congregations on seeing the altar are immediately reminded, sub-consciously, of killing, blood and death.
But in fact it’s to do with ‘adrenaline’, a substance which is used medicinally in some health problems, but is also used illegally by sports people, to improve their strength, banned in all professional sports and can lead to fines or disqualification.
If an animal is frightened its body produces adrenaline, as do human bodies, the hormone of ‘flight or fight’. It pumps into the blood stream and into the flesh, when meat is cooked with it in, it takes longer to cook and is tough. All Halal meat cooks faster and , unless badly cooked, is tender and easier to digest.
Now socially there is also a problem, people eat meat laced throughout with adrenalin, because the meat is not Halal, then they go to clubs and pubs, drink alcohol, with then acts to make it ”explosive”.
The week end in countries like Britain and the USA, and parts of Europe, have lots of fighting and people visiting the emergency rooms at hospitals. In the next few days some of them are asked why did they start fighting, they say they don’t really know, but something sparked them off.
What is was that caused it, was the adrenalin in what they had eaten, not naturally formed adrenalin of their own bodies. It’s something that has been used in warfare for thousands of years.
Adrenalin causes the feeling of paranoia, that something or somone is ”having a go at them’, so they ‘react’. One finds in most cases with Muslims, that they are more thoughtfull and slower to be ‘reactionaries’ in such situations. Which is one of the reasons that Muslims are know worldwide as ‘peaceful people’, peacefulness is institutionalised in how they kill animals..
Its something that any group or nation can apply, to bring more peace to their societies, as is happening now in Europe amongst none Muslims..
From time immemorial, Muslims have been in charge of slaughtering animals meant for public consumption. However, a certain group of Christians in Kabale last month declared they would take over the job. This has angered Muslim leaders who have perceived this as a direct attack on the Muslim faith.
Its not as such an attack on any faith, its an attack on the peacfulness of society, as revisionsit christians do not apply either Jewish or Muslim methods, but use fast methods of killing in slaughter houses, which fills the flesh of the animals with adrenalin.
Kiirya says the matter was resolved on grounds that since everybody would eat meat slaughtered by Muslims, there was no harm for the Muslims to officially be given the responsibility
Which is correct.
with a suggestion that since Muslims had been authorised to slaughter animals for public consumption, they should also slaughter pigs for the Christians. Kiirya also adds that Islam has laws regarding which foods can and cannot be eaten and also on the proper method of slaughtering an animal for consumption. But if there is no other food available, a Muslim is allowed to eat non-halal food according to the Koran. (Surah 2:173).
It is correct that Muslims do not oppose eating of pig meat if needed, but it is considered to be ‘low value’ meat otherwise, as it contain fat all the way through, which cannot really be removed. There is little in cuts of pig meat that do not have amounts of fat, which is different from beef, where most can be trimmed off, or sheep where much will melt in cooking and drain off.
In Britain since the 1980’s, its been know that fat is the main cause of stomach cancer, so the old laws on food have been fully verified as being correct.
The Jews are the only ones who ‘absolutely’ oppose eating of pig meat, even though old manuscripts have revealed that at certain times of the year, the jews-judeans used to eat pig meat, at festivals. Which would be correct, as swine fever only happens at certain times of the year, so can be avoided otherwise. And with freezing pig meat immediately the risk of tape worms is now diminished, they could kill, and did regularly amongst pig eaters. Tape worms exist in the intestines, but when they lay eggs, the eggs will travel through the host to the flesh and can be eaten as cooking doesn’t kill them, some have been taken out of people well over three feet long.
In some European states, most foods are now labelled halal, in order to restore hope among Muslims.
Packaging wih Halal written on it has become common in Britain, most people take it simply to be a standard of good quality food, it’s become very popular because of it.
, and CAIR , these scanners will be easier to get around than your old gym teacher.</p>
<p>In direct response to the attempted bombing of an aircraft on Christmas day, by a Muslim from Nigeria, 450 scanners are reportedly due to be installed in American airports. Nonetheless, Muslims believe they should be exempt.</p>
<p>According to freep.com:</p>
<p>“The Fiqh Council of North America – a body of Islamic scholars that includes some from Michigan – issued a fatwa this week that says going through the airport scanners would violate Islamic rules on modesty. “It is a violation of clear Islamic teachings that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,” reads the fatwa issued Tuesday.”</p>
<p>“Two members of the Fiqh Council are from Michigan, Imam Hassan Qazwini of the Islamic Center of Americain Dearborn, and Imam Ali Suleiman Ali of the Canton Mosque. “Fiqh” means Islamic jurisprudence.”</p>
<p>“The Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has a chapter in Michigan, says it endorses the fatwa.”</p>
<p>“We support the Fiqh Council’s statement on full-body scanners and believe that the religious and privacy rights of passengers can be respected while maintaining safety and security,” said Nihad Awad, national executive director of CAIR .”</p>
<p>What good is setting up these scanners if CAIR, which has ties to Hamas, gives Muslim’ terrorists a free pass, while your old gym teacher will step behind the screen thinking her cooperation is helping to keep America safe?</p>
<div class=){kind=link}